| discov_num |
notes |
refcode |
| BRG 18 |
This target, like BRG 23, gives conflicting information about whether |
|
|
the AB pair is physically bound. The brightness and color are fully |
|
|
consistent with B being an M3.5 companion to the M2.0 primary. |
|
|
Furthermore, the separation is only 0.2", and the whole field is |
|
|
otherwise empty. This indicates physical companionship. However, the |
|
|
deviation from the expectation of a background source is only 1.1 |
|
|
sigma, and the companion has moved 3.6 times closer to the background |
|
|
expectation than its original position where the motion has a 14 sigma |
|
|
confidence. This, by contrast, suggests a chance alignment. Since the |
|
|
magnitude of motion is not inconsistent with what could be expected |
|
|
for orbital motion of a real physical pair, we keep it as binary in |
|
|
our analysis, but we note that further observations will be necessary |
|
|
in order to resolve this issue satisfactorily. |
Jnn2012 |
| refcode |
metd |
author |
reference |
| Jnn2012 |
Cl j |
Janson, M., Hormuth, F., Bergfors, C., Brandner, W., Hippler, S., Daemgen, S., |
2012ApJ...754...44J |
| Jnn2012 |
+E2 |
Kudryavtseva, N., Schmalzl, E., Schnupp, C., & Henning, T. |
|
| Jnn2012 |
|
ApJ 754, 44, 2012 (some recalibrated measures published in Jnn2014b) |
2014ApJS..214...17J |
| idgroup |
discov |
author |
| 1 |
BRG |
Bergfors, C. Brandner, W., Janson, M., Daemgen, S., Geissler, K., Henning, T., |
| 1 |
BRG |
Hippler, S., Hormuth, F., Joergens, V., & Koehler, R. |
| 10 |
BRG |
Bergfors, C. Brandner, W., Daemgen, S., Biller, B., Hippler, S., Janson, M., |
| 10 |
BRG |
Kudryavtseva, N., Geissler, K., Henning, T., & Koehler, R. |
| 11 |
BRG |
Bergfors, C. Brandner, W., Bonnefoy, M., Schlieder, J., Janson, M., Henning, Th. & |
| 11 |
BRG |
Chauvin, G. |
